Search
VTS Section HPE Section CPD Section
   

An Introduction
PLPs
PLP or PDP?
Revalidation
Courses/Events
Diary Dates
Retainer Scheme
Study Leave
Useful Links
Forms
Lifelong Learning

Clinical Section
Humour Bytes

 

An introduction - What is CPD?

CPD is the acronym for Continuing Professional Development. This is the education and development after certification and licensure to practice, and it is arguably the longest, most complex phase of medical education.

For many years, this process almost exclusively involved attending

meetings
 
conferences,
 
and annual medleys which were designed to deliver
the latest developments in various specialties.

This was what we call the "teacher-driven" process:

"Teacher-driven" process:

in simple terms, the teacher (a consultant or specialist usually) decided the content and delivered it as they saw fit.

All we could do as attendees was to say at the end (in the evaluation form) whether we liked it or not. As we were usually passive attenders (apart from the small minority that would engage with questions seeking specific answers to problems they encountered), most of what we were spoon-fed was lost from our memory very quickly.

Most people attend only meetings on topics they have a special interest in, and routinely avoid topics they feel less comfortable with.

In the best of cases, what we hear is not retained for long: less than 50% is retained after the first 24 hours, less than 25% after a week, and less than 10% by a month's time. As the ancient Chinese proverb aptly states:

"He who hears, forgets; he who sees, remembers; he who does, knows"

Active Learning

That is where active learning comes in: we, as practising doctors, define where the gaps in our knowledge are, and how we are going to meet them.

We may find that patients ask us things we do not know immediately how to answer (these are called PUNs: Patient Unmet Needs); we can then go away and read about them.

This way, we have translated a PUN into a DEN (the acronym for Doctor Educational Need). We can also try various other methods of determining our learning needs: audit and significant event audit are just two of them.

Where do we find the time to do it, I hear you say...in our busy professional lives, we are often having to work hard to find a reasonable balance between personal and professional time. And as active learning certainly takes more time than passive, lecture-based learning, why would we want to embark on such an experience?

The answer is different for every individual; for me, these are the reasons:

Because I enjoy it: my father was a hard-working gynaecologist in Greece; in the rare occasions that he was ill and unable to attend work for a day or so, he was very unhappy. I remember asking him as a teenager why this was so, and his answer was “because I love what I do; if I ever stopped loving my work, I would immediately retire. And anything that keeps me from doing what I love makes me unhappy”. This instilled in me from a very early age this premise: unless we enjoy what we do, it will eventually lead us to burnout much sooner.
 
Because I believe that quality, not quantity, is what matters: attending 6 courses on dermatology may make me good at it, but not necessarily a good GP, unless I equally attend courses in all the other aspects relevant to my work. And unless I am actively thinking “where are the gaps in my knowledge?” and do something about addressing most of them, sooner or later these tend to increase. And it is these gaps that make my general practice less secure, as far as patient care is concerned.
 
Because it gives me a sense of achievement: just as planting some seeds, seeing a plant develop, feeding it, watering it and weeding it before you see it grow to its full splendour can make us proud of what we do, tackling my deficiencies and imrpoving some of them every year makes me feel better about myself; it gives me a sense of purpose.
 
Because it is the adult way of learning: adult learners, by definition, learn through motivation and experience. They define their own learning needs, and then seek ways to address them. This way, what they learn is more relevant to their specific requirements.
 
Because it is more fun: I am one of those people who need variety in my life; doing exactly the same every day makes life dull and uninspiring for me. I am not against core elements of stability (family/working environment/religion); on the contrary, I believe these pillars are necessary to allow the daily variations to happen without danger. But variety allows flexibility and stimulates the mind. It has a refreshing effect on a patient-weary soul: after listening to so many patients about death & illness, being able to do something different fires up my imagination, and somehow lifts some mental & emotional fatigue off my shoulders.
 
Because it is more relevant: To explain this, I will give you an example: I attended an annual Neurology Study Day in Bristol 2 years ago. The room was packed with eager GPs, ready to ask questions. Some were watching tentatively; others were scribbling notes furiously, as the speaker addressed the 100-strong audience. At some stage, he turned to us all and said “I suspect you are here to ask me questions about insomnia”, and looked to the crowd: many nods could be seen around the room, and quite a few verbal confirmations could be heard. At this point, he said “but what I want to talk to you today is not insomnia, but somnolence”. The audible “Ahhhh...” of the disappointment could match that heard at Wimbledon by Henman fans when he misses a break point he could have easily converted. Since the vast majority of patients we are faced with suffer from the former, why on Earth would we want to spend an hour on the latter? This is precisely what can go wrong when the agenda is teacher (and not learner) driven.

I could go on and on about the positives; one big potential drawback is isolation; for in conferences we meet colleagues, socialize and blend in; we cannot do that in adult learning unless we choose to learn in small groups. Even learning in a group of 2 is better than learning on our own. This way we avoid isolation and boredom, and as 1+1 equals more than 2, in terms of sharing new knowledge, it is well worth thinking about.

Without further chatter from me, welcome to the website's CPD area; we hope it will be helpful and suited to your needs. The only way we can achieve this is through your help and feedback, though; so please let us know what you think of it, what you would like to see included, what you disagree with. We will take it all constructively and try to address the gaps as they are pointed to us.

Best wishes

Harry Minas

GP Educationalist, Bristol

 

Copyright © 2004 Visual Productions Ltd. All rights reserved.